Vercel vs a European alternative

That depends on what the project actually ships. A static or SPA build moves over cleanly and behaves the same. An app leaning on ISR, RSC streaming, server actions or the Edge runtime belongs on Vercel, which was engineered for exactly that workload. Let the site type decide, not the logo.

On Vercel, bandwidth, image optimisation and function invocations are all metered, so a traffic spike shows up on the invoice. A VibeDeploy plan is a fixed number with a generous bandwidth allowance already inside it. Outgrow the allowance and you move up one plan tier; nobody bills you by the gigabyte.

Three concrete things: GDPR compliance that is easier to evidence, eligibility for contracts carrying data-residency clauses, and a jurisdiction answer your customers can verify. Vercel routes globally on US-based core infrastructure; VibeDeploy serves exclusively from Belgian data centres, so EU visitor data never crosses out of EU jurisdiction.

Vercel is a US company serving sites through a global edge network. Paid plans can pin serverless functions to a chosen region, including European regions, but static assets still travel through the global CDN and a DPA is tied to paid tiers. An EU-resident alternative changes the default: VibeDeploy serves the site from Belgian infrastructure under EU jurisdiction, with a GDPR DPA on paid plans.

For a project that builds to static or SPA output, budget about ten minutes. Run the build, drop the output folder into VibeDeploy, repoint the domain. The code itself does not change at all.