GitHub Pages vs a European alternative
GitHub Pages is unbeatable at what it is: free static publishing for people whose workflow already lives in Git. VibeDeploy targets the workflows Pages cannot serve: sites deployed by AI agents over MCP, run under EU jurisdiction with forms, snapshots and rollback, maintained by people who may never open a terminal.
At a glance
| Feature | VibeDeploy EU-only, flat | GitHub Pages |
|---|---|---|
| Price | From €15 monthly once the 14-day trial ends | Included free with GitHub |
| Hosting region | Belgium exclusively, EU jurisdiction | Fastly CDN, US-centric |
| Deploy method | MCP agent, dashboard upload, or Git push | Commit pushed to the repository |
| Forms / backups / rollback | Part of the platform | remove |
| Best for | AI-deployed sites and non-developers | OSS docs and personal pages |
GitHub Pages pricing
Snapshot from GitHub Pages's pricing page, last verified 2026-06-29. Always check upstream for current pricing.
Included with any GitHub account. Public repos are free; private-repo Pages needs Pro
Around $4/month if you want Pages served from a private repository
Full feature comparison
| Feature | VibeDeploy EU-only, flat | GitHub Pages |
|---|---|---|
| Static / SPA sites | check_circle | check_circle |
| Custom domains free | check_circle | check_circle |
| Automatic HTTPS | check_circle | check_circle |
| Hosting region | EU (Belgium) only | US-centric CDN |
| Price | From €15/mo after trial | Free |
| Requires Git knowledge | remove | check_circle |
| Deploy from AI agent (MCP) | check_circle | remove |
| Built-in forms relay | check_circle | remove |
| Daily backups + one-click rollback | check_circle | remove |
| Dashboard for non-developers | check_circle | Repo + Actions UI |
| Server-side / dynamic | remove | remove |
| Soft usage limits | Plan-based, predictable | ~1GB site, ~100GB/mo bandwidth (soft) |
When GitHub Pages is the better pick
- arrow_forwardFree forever for public static sites and you want to keep it that way
- arrow_forwardOpen-source project documentation and personal/portfolio pages
- arrow_forwardGit-native workflow where every change is a commit and PR
- arrow_forwardYou already live in GitHub and want hosting one click from the repo
- arrow_forwardData residency is irrelevant for the content you are publishing
When VibeDeploy wins
- check_circleHosting must sit under EU jurisdiction rather than a US-centric CDN
- check_circleDeploys come from an AI agent over MCP, with Git optional rather than mandatory
- check_circleThe site needs working forms without a third-party service bolted on
- check_circleRollback should be a dashboard click backed by snapshots, not a revert commit
- check_circleNon-developers maintain the site after launch
- check_circleSupport and a DPA matter more than a free tier
Common questions
GitHub Pages is free, why pay for VibeDeploy?expand_more
Where a Git-native free host covers the need and jurisdiction is irrelevant, GitHub Pages deserves the recommendation and gets it. The paid case starts where Pages structurally ends: serving under EU jurisdiction, deploys performed by an AI agent with no Git involved, forms that work on a static page, and snapshots with one-click rollback. The 14 free days exist so you can verify that trade before paying.
Do I need to know Git to use VibeDeploy?expand_more
Not at all, and that is a structural difference rather than a convenience. Pages cannot function without commits and pushes. Here, the dashboard handles uploads directly, and MCP-capable agents such as Claude, Cursor or Windsurf publish through https://mcp.vibedeploy.be/mcp on your behalf. Git remains available for those who want build-on-push, but nothing requires it.
Where is each one hosted, and does that matter for GDPR?expand_more
GitHub is a US company under Microsoft, and Pages content rides a US-centric CDN. VibeDeploy's serving happens in Belgian data centres with a DPA on every paid plan. The moment a site collects or reflects personal data of EU users, that difference stops being cosmetic and becomes a compliance property.
Can GitHub Pages handle forms or backups?expand_more
Static file serving is the whole Pages product: a form needs an external service wired in, and there is no backup or rollback surface beyond reverting commits. On VibeDeploy the forms relay delivers submissions by email out of the box, and daily snapshots restore from the dashboard in one click.
Can VibeDeploy run server-side code like GitHub Pages cannot?expand_more
Neither platform executes your backend; both serve static and SPA output only. Anything needing a live server process wants a different layer entirely. The distinction between these two is jurisdiction, deploy method and platform features, not compute.
More comparisons
Test it against your own requirements
Fourteen days on the full platform: domains, staging, snapshots, forms and MCP deploys on EU infrastructure. No credit card.